Sage Abra
LearningAction® WHITE PAPER:
Sexual Harassment and Other Legal Issues: Why Training is Important
The
Law Has Changed
A recent wave
of changes in the law has made it essential for companies to conduct
training on matters of legal sensitivity.
The U.S. Supreme
Court released two key decisions in June of 1998. As a result of
these decisions, a company can dramatically reduce the likelihood
of liability through an "affirmative defense" if it can
show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it (a) excercised
reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing
behavior, and (b) that the plaintiff employee unreasonably failed
to take advantage of any preventative or corrective opportunities
provided by the employer. (Note that this defense is available whenever
the employee has not suffered tangible employment action as a result
of the alleged harassment -- e.g., been fired or denied a promotion.)
Law firms and
in-house counsel universally recognize that, as a result of these
court decisions, companies need to institute effective training
policies that will teach employees what sexual harassment is, and
what to do if an employee believes that harassment has occurred.
It is important that this training be able to reach all of a company's
workers and that a company be able to document that this training
occurred.
Furthermore,
numerous other courts have expanded the Supreme Court decisions
beyond sexual harassment. The employer's affirmative defense has
been extended, so that it now applies to discrimination against
all other protected classes. For instance, one recent federal court
decision found that a company was liable for racial discrimination
committed by one of its employees where the company did not effectively
disseminate its anti-discrimination policy to employees.
Training Reduces
Harassment and Discrimination
Many companies
have conducted sexual harassment and discrimination training for
many years Companies find that training is an effective way to reduce
complaints and lawsuits and to make the workplace more productive.
According to the Society for Human Resources Management, approximately
62 percent of companies currently conduct sexual harassment training
of some sort.
The Cost of
Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace
Companies of
all sizes have repeatedly faced high-publicity lawsuits in which
they have incurred tremendous damage from jury awards, settlements,
other costs and fees, and negative press exposure:
- More than 50%
of companies have been named as defendants in at least one suit
in the past five years, according to a study conducted by a leading
national human resources professional organization.
- Larger companies
(those with more than 250 workers) reported an average of 6.08 sexual
harassment complaints per year, while smaller companies reported
an average of 2.18 complaints per year, according to a study by
a leading national human resources professional organization.
- When a company
is sued in a harassment case, it statistically has a greater than
50 percent chance of losing the case.
- The average
jury award in discrimination and sexual harassment suits was around
$100,000 in 1996, up from $75,000 the year before, according to
a recent research on national jury verdict awards. Additionally,
in approximately one-third of discrimination and harassment suits,
companies also were required to pay punitive damages averaging $75,000.
- Jury awards
are just the beginning of the costs companies incur. Companies also
face large attorneys' fees of their own and may be required to pay
attorneys' fees for the plaintiff as well. Companies also face very
large settlement costs. In addition, there are also court fees and
the cost of time invested in responding to suits.
Most significantly,
the bad press and damaged reputation is enormous. When Texaco was
hit with a discrimination lawsuit—which it ultimately settled
for $176 million—civil rights leaders urged a boycott of the
company, the company's stock fell, and many customers stayed away.
Smaller companies faced with harassment and discrimination suits
are hit with similar negative publicity on local TV stations and
in the local press.
There has been
an increase in large, class-action harassment suits filed by the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against companies.
The pharmaceutical company Astra recently paid $10 million to settle
a large harassment claim, and Mitsubishi settled a similar claim
for $34 million.
|